Their expert ratings and recommendations publication editors within decisions and you can make sure that wrote scientific studies are valid, rigid, and you can reputable. Writers get a hold of peer writers mainly because of their qu’est-ce que ourtime from inside the-breadth knowledge of the subject number or methods of the task he or she is requested to check. This systems is actually invaluable and you can irreplaceable. Fellow writers try guilty of the accuracy and you may feedback expressed inside the reports, and the peer feedback process operates with the a theory away from common believe anywhere between authors, writers and you can writers. Despite fast advances, generative AI products provides big restrictions: they could lack right up-to-date studies that will make nonsensical, biased otherwise untrue information. Manuscripts may include sensitive otherwise proprietary guidance that ought to perhaps not feel common away from fellow remark processes. For these reasons we ask you to definitely, if you’re Springer Nature examines delivering our very own fellow writers which have accessibility safer AI units, peer reviewers dont publish manuscripts into generative AI units.
If any the main testing of your says built in new manuscript was in in whatever way supported by a keen AI tool, i query fellow reviewers so you can state the effective use of eg systems transparently on the peer feedback report.
Citations
Lookup blogs and you may low-lookup articles (age.grams. Opinion, Comment, and you will Feedback posts) need certainly to cite appropriate and you will related literary works to get brand new claims made. Excessive notice-ticket, paired work certainly several article authors so you can with each other notice-mention, gratuitous and you will too many admission away from blogs published about record to help you that the report has been recorded, and every other kind of violation control is actually inappropriate.
Pass manipulation can lead to the content becoming denied, that can feel reported to help you authors’ institutions. Likewise, people effort by the fellow-writers or editors to remind such as means shall be advertised by authors towards creator.
- Experts must look into the next advice when preparing its manuscript:
- Any report on manuscript you to relies on exterior types of advice (i.elizabeth. not the latest authors’ individual new records or conclusions otherwise standard studies) is fool around with a ticket.
- Article writers will be prevent mentioning derivations away from brand-new performs. Such, they have to mention the first really works in the place of an assessment blog post one alludes to exclusive works.
- Article writers is to make certain that its citations is actually real (we.e. they need to ensure the citation helps the fresh report manufactured in its manuscript and should not misrepresent a new work by the pointing out they if the it will not hold the section the article writers desire to build).
- Authors shouldn’t mention supplies they’ve not understand.
- People cannot preferentially mention their own or their friends’, peers’, or institution’s products.
- Writers is always to prevent mentioning really works solely from a single country.
- Article authors should not use a too high quantity of citations to help with one point.
- Ideally, article authors is to mention provide having experienced fellow opinion where it is possible to.
- Writers shouldn’t cite advertising otherwise advertorial material.
Preprint revealing and you can citation
BMC periodicals encourage post away from preprints regarding top research manuscripts on preprint server of your own authors’ solutions, authors’ or organization other sites, and you may discover interaction between experts whether or not with the area preprint servers otherwise preprint posting comments networks.
Preprints was identified as an author’s sort of research manuscript prior to specialized peer remark in the a record, that is placed with the a public machine (due to the fact demonstrated for the Preprints into the life sciences. Science 352, 899901; 2016); preprints are posted any time inside the fellow feedback process. Publish out-of preprints isnt believed earlier in the day guide and won’t jeopardize planning in the BMC magazines. Manuscripts released towards preprint servers won’t be considered whenever choosing the advance provided by a survey concerned on a good BMC diary.
BMC keeps partnered which have Search Rectangular ( BMC provides a big part need for Look Square) to add For the Comment, a record-integrated provider to own preprint revealing, supporting writers around the all groups i are designed to show their browse early. Article authors submitting to some BMC guides are also able to in public share information about the peer comment thanks to Inside Comment. General information about Inside Review within BMC and the Lookup Square preprint system can be obtained here this is when .